Realty bubble deflated, an oil town gets down to business
ICL
".....may force companies to consider other alternatives such as taking loans from banks instead of accepting deposits."
The
new rules, as understood, has the one basic objective of safeguarding
and protecting the interests of the investing public, mostly in the
category suffering from ignorance or imbecility , having no capacity to
know the nitty-gritty or not-so-obvious risk factors. Even if the "other
alternatives" were to be resorted by the invested companies,that would
have the same frightful consequences; the only difference being it is
the banks and stakeholders to whom the same risk factors would be passed
and be faced with.
As regards the mentioned requirements of
filing returns or documents with the ROCs, without the machinery of a
sophisticated kind in place to constantly scrutinize and keep monitoring
as a continuous exercise,it seems to be a mere empty formality, so
called paper-tiger, with no real purpose to serve.
Similarly , the requirement
"to
obtain credit rating at regular intervals during the tenure of the
deposit", is at best, of nuisance value, again with no real purpose to
be served.
These , noted to have been simply glossed over in the
write-up, nonetheless , in one's perspective, do call for a rethinking
and drastic modifications of the new rules, seemingly framed with no
insightful examination of the intricate implications.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment