Update
BL
July 2
< The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill was meant to bring to an end all such unsavoury practices. This was obviously not to the liking of the builders. Therefore, it isn't surprising that the Bill is yet to become law.> ?????
Recent Article in Real Estate
Investments
in realty shrank 65% in 2013
Imponderables:
As observed, stands taken are mutually conflicting; no way to readily see, or even venture an honorable guess, the truth or falsehood behind, without a long drawn investigation.
(Open to - Edit ; and Upright public –centric counter- views, if any)
<> ecopack
BL
July 2
Three questions on the Chennai building collapse
< Finally, if a home buyer is indeed caught in a situation such as this, what is the recourse? When the property is under construction, IF THE UNDIVIDED SHARE OF LAND (UDS) HAD BEEN REGISTERED in favour of the individual buyer, then owners can form an association to fight a case against the builder and Government agencies, says Sundar. But the process will be a long drawn one, due to the backlogs in the system.
June 26
Posted: 25 Jun 2014 07:12 AM PDT
By Accommodation Times News Service Chief Minister Prithviraj
Chavan has offered a solution to the residents Campa Cola that will
ensure the 96 illegal flats are not demolished and they return to legal
flats. CM has showed willingness o take the opinion of solicitor-general
Ranjit Kumar and advocate-general Darius Khambata […]
BSZero tolerance |
Govt should prevent construction of illegal floors and buildings
|
< The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill was meant to bring to an end all such unsavoury practices. This was obviously not to the liking of the builders. Therefore, it isn't surprising that the Bill is yet to become law.> ?????
PREV.
BL
Recent Article in Real Estate
Investments
in realty shrank 65% in 2013
"......is legal
and is approved from Noida Authority.”
"......Campa Cola
Housing Complex in Mumbai for illegal construction. Later, it stayed the
demolition till May this year.
Common man has
been wildly wondering, if not been least bothered or not perplexed, over such news coming in a
series. Imponderables:
1. Why
courts need to be called upon to deal and take upon selves to adjudicate on such
matters of admitted illegalities – in which
no point of law or question of any constitutional or statutory right involved;
thereby, wasting courts’ valuable time and energy expected to be devoted to more important/priority matters having wider ramifications for the people
/ society at large ?
2. Q ”......is
legal and is approved from Noida Authority.”
“......Campa Cola Housing
Complex in Mumbai for illegal construction. Later, it stayed the demolition
till May this year.” UQ
As observed, stands taken are mutually conflicting; no way to readily see, or even venture an honorable guess, the truth or falsehood behind, without a long drawn investigation.
Is it not high time that courts
have the doors kept closed , and strictly not entertain such disputes, in which it is the concerned administrative
authorities, besides , of course, the aggrieved low- or lately- aroused private parties, who have to exclusively share the entire blame for all such episodes
coming to be given publicity day in and day out?
3. What
the fully and exclusively empowered housing ministry/urban development
authorities at the centre and /or state have been doing all along; except to
remain recacitrantly mute spectators, unless and until both sides decide to
knock at the doors of courts ?
4. Last
but not least, should not those be in any case made not merely a necessary
party but ranked / lined up as the first and principal parties ; also be called
upon to explain ?
(Open to - Edit ; and Upright public –centric counter- views, if any)
<> ecopack
No comments:
Post a Comment