Sunday, May 10, 2015

LLP as a vehicle to engage in and carry on any 'profession' - Pros -any Cons ?

Top-up

Tough Companies Act creating a shift towards LLP?

< 

*Be Cautious: Professional Indemnity Insurance is Must after ...




BL

For a one-stop consultancy shop

Harinderjit Singh

Auditing, legal and cost accounting services offered under a single roof can transform the efficiency of Indian business »
Partners can breathe easy

  • Under MDP, the nature of work that flows could be so divergent that all partners may not be involved in the execution of each assignment. In such a situation, the risk factor involved needs to be evaluated. It is possible that due to the negligence of some partner, the civil liability on the firm in the form of damages or compensation could be heavy. Under the Partnership Act 1932, the liability of a firm is unlimited and the partners are personally, jointly and severally liable in respect of the obligations of the firm. Unlimited liability of partners and the firm will vanish if the liability of the partnership firm and partners could be limited in an MDP — hence the LLP. An LLP combines the organisational flexibility and tax status of a partnership with the advantage of limited liability.
  • In the UK, MDPs are mainly popular among several professionals’ services. Since MDPs tend to have regulatory overlaps in UK, they are addressed by one regulator relying on the work of another. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs can play a pivotal role by asking three key professional bodies to enter into a mutual recognition agreement (MRA) with other professional body or institution situated outside India.
  • The concept of LLP should also be popularised with regulators for engineering, architecture and actuarial services. Similar to the ICAI’s new law, allowing partnership with specified professions, AICTE should pass a similar resolutions to include MBAs.
  • “Clients are better served by having experts from various professions addressing problems in a comprehensive manner. Clients may also get economies of scale if they purchase professional services in a package rather.”
@FAcebook
“Clients are better served..... Clients may also get economies of scale if they purchase professional services in a package rather.”
On the first blush, the suggestion of a ‘one-stop shop’ / ‘package’, for professionals, - which, as understood, is to structure MDP following the model of LLP, and the extended suggestion for MDPs to, in turn, enter into a MRP, - does not prima facie seem to have been offered after a close and incisive study of the inherent shortcomings in the LLP form of entity. Albeit, the concept has been given a legal shape and formally gone ahead with and in vogue in respect of professions, including the three professions spoken of.
According to a view, however, as shared openly as to what those shortcomings/ pitfalls are, anyone, if itching to know, may have a peep into enough material available in public domain; in particular, attention may be given to the viewpoints brought out in a couple of published articles. As per the analytical study made therein, there is a fundamental fallacy in the premise that LLP, as a form of legal entity, from the viewpoint of clients, will serve their interests better, in comparison to the time-tested age-old concept of ‘partnership’ governed by the Partnership Act.
Also refer, -

*Be Cautious: Professional Indemnity Insurance is Must after Companies Act 2013
on the aspect of ‘risk’ made a passing reference to, Professional Indemnity Insurance no doubt provides desired financial protection for a wide range of professional advisers. But, In the event any one suffers financial loss, there could be other related impediments; for knowing more, may look back and go through the broad discussion in, among others , published articles, –
(2005)128 Comp.Cas 1 and (2006) 65 SCL 42


Cross Refer OldBlogs

*Be Cautious: Professional Indemnity Insurance is Must after ...



 <<<<<<<<
Google Search >>>>


www.slideshare.net/kronus2001/legal-entity
www.icaew.com/.../Products/.../understanding-limited-liability-partnershi...
Dicken, ... Of the respondents, 9% reported some disadvantages of the LLP format (less.
www.applebyglobal.com/.../llp---guernsey-s-new-flexible-business-struct...
A disadvantage is that general partnerships, unlike ... activity which is not necessarily trade or business (for example, acting as a ...
www.researchgate.net/.../228119362_Limited_Liability_Partnership_in_In...
 Iavor Rangelov, Nationalism and the Rule of Law: Lessons from the Balkans ...

 < ....LLP enters into contracts in its own name in the same way as a limited company, and its members have the advantage of limited liability similar to the shareholders of a company. Thus, in the event of a business failure or disputes and claims, the liability would be limited to the partner responsible. There would be no recourse to attach the personal assets of the other members, except the member who was personally responsible to negligent. ...>
 
Limited Liability Partnership in India: An Overview. Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228119362_Limited_Liability_Partnership_in_India_An_Overview [accessed Jun 2, 2015].

 <<<<<
www.bbburn.com/pmart18.html
·  Although professionals ... there are disadvantages to using a ULC as a vehicle to carry on business in ...
 ... Internal governance: The LLP Members themselves carry ... (under LLP law article 16), limitations on the types of .... They are also considered as tax-efficient vehicles for international trade.
www.paulhypepage.com/guide-faq/limited-liability-partnership/
·  ... Parties concerned should consider the pros and cons of each type of vehicle to ... Our team of seasoned professional can help you set up a company in ...
www.ssm.com.my/en/LLP-AboutLLP
  1. Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is an alternative business vehicle regulated under the ... Accountants and Company Secretaries for the purpose of carrying on their professional practice. ... Change Of Nature Of Business/Principal Activities



1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Merilyn - The Ship ! ; Adv. Or CA - who is eligible to taxpractice ; et al (Like Episodes)

An UPdate

 itatonline

See Also:
ICAI Advertisement Guidelines
Advertising by Advocates in India
Posted in All Information, Others



TG

 Are Chartered Accountants Really Independent?


 TProff

Accounting Principals
 
Doubts have been expressed regarding increase the rate of service tax from 12.36% to 14%.
 
 
Accounting Principals ?


< Read Comments

TG

MAT: Retrospective Tax Is Back?

MAT provisions in s. 115JB do not apply to foreign companies


MORE


ml
Tax Tentacles – 1: An Overview


The Indian tax system is devilishly complex, extortive and a patchwork of various haphazard ideas. This is the first part of a multi-part series on the vexing Indian tax system and the path to genuine reforms, adapted from Justice S Rangarajan Memorial Lecture in Bangalore delivered recently
Justice TNC Rangarajan (retd)




prarthana_jalan
“Merlyin” – A Ship That Neither Sinks Nor Reaches It’s Shore

CA Prarthana Jalan


The author expresses dismay over the fact that though a Special Bench was constituted to resolve an important controversy, the controversy is far from over. Worse, there appears to be no quick resolution in sight in view of the conflicting High Court judgements on the issue. She pleads for the adoption of a quick dispute resolution process to deal with such issues. 

 The text of sec 40a(ia) is as under-

 (ia) any interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for professional services or fees for technical services payable to a resident, or amounts payable to a contractor or sub-contractor, being resident, for carrying out any work (including supply of labour for carrying out any work), on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction, has not been paid on or before the due date specified in sub-section (1) of section 139.


<<<<
Whenever controversy arises about an interpretation of the ambiguity of law then why don’t we have a system wherein reputed/leaned representatives of law/legal fraternity/judicial members can sit together and reach a specific consensus? Why don’t we have a mechanism wherein instead of going through the litigation process individually, wasting time, energy & money of all the parties involved, an interpretation can be done collectively?

cross refer >

New database of High Courts unearths a 57-year-old case ...

www.thehindu.com/.../new-database-of-high-courts-unearths-a-57yearol...
 http://vswaminathan-swamilook.blogspot.in/2015/03/fertile-resource-blogs.html




> As regards the view the SC has taken, particularly the given reasoning, as viewed, throws up some intriguing points, pivoted on , besides the “matching concept”, the other related concepts of relevance herein, being ,- “method of accounting”, “paid”, “incurred” and “accrued” ; which, as is expected , may have continued to keep nagging for long the mind of an ‘accountant’, if not a lawyer. Those points , as remembered, have been briefly brought to the fore and shared in , – A HAND BOOK ON TAX PRACTICE (Publisher – Puliani and Puliani)

>> i ) Any debit in the accounts in accordance with the accounting practice based on what is known as ‘matching concept’ is not to be regarded as ‘accrued due’, being the legal meaning of ‘incurred';
ii) The accounting practice since changed for long, for ‘companies’ , ‘accrual’ method of accounting is mandated;
with no option given; hence ‘cash’ method remains ruled out.
iii) The term ‘paid’, as specially defined, means (a) ‘actually paid’ (i.e. cash) OR (b) ‘incurred according to the method of accounting’.
In today’s context, however, the third method known as ‘mixed’ is no longer an option, hence of no relevance. As such, and as ‘cash’ has been separately spelt out as in (a) , the latter expression (b) can only mean ‘accrued due’. What is intriguing is, why then, the term ‘accrual’ makes sense any longer; albeit it is, continued to be used, unwittingly or otherwise, both for accounting and tax.
II. Certain observations of the SC, as read and understood, wprt section 36 (1)(iii) , seem to imply that, if so chosen by assessee, claim could be spread over, following the ‘matching concept’, for accounting . so also for tax.
Nonetheless, if independently analyzed, there could possibly be a different but better view taken. Why say so ? For reasoning, may look up the study as set out in the published Article (TAXMANN) – 14 CPT 819 (at 821, 822)

>>> Among the points qualified as ‘intriguing’, the most concern is the definition of ‘paid’ adverted to.
As per settled position in law, “income’ , if it has been received, attracts tax at that point in time; with no need to further go into and probe as to whether or not accrued .
If so, in sync, expenditure once paid, has to be allowed – that appears to be the crux of the SC judgment.
Anyone having a contra viewpoint!

ALSO HERE >





< xtract

"VIII. Interest on loan taken for acquisition of an asset could only be capitalized till the asset is first put to use

Currently, Section 36(1)(iii) allows deduction for interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for the purposes of the business or profession while computing the income from business or profession.
However, any interest paid in respect of capital borrowed for acquisition of an asset for extension of existing business or profession (whether capitalized in the books of account or not) for any period beginning from the date on which the capital was borrowed for acquisition of the asset till the date on which such asset was first put to use, was not allowed as deduction.
The Finance Bill, 2015 as passed by Lok Sabha proposes to remove this distinction in allowability of interest in case of existing business and in case of extension of existing business. It proposes to remove the words "for extension of existing business or profession" from proviso to Section 36(1)(iii). Thus, it is proposed that interest on borrowings used for acquisition of asset till the asset is put to use shall not be allowed as deduction in any case."

Cross Refer > Adv. N Devanathan's comment /reply thereto

<<<<

Controversy freshly stoked/  kindled to keep going/kept alive:

 Doubts over appearance of Chartered Accountants before Income Tax Authorities

Added In Income Tax
Xtract

......
The income tax officials are threatening practicing CAs that they can’t appear before them, Recently Tax Bar Association, Rishikesh has issued a letter to Income Tax Authorities to ban chartered accountants from appearing before them. Earlier ,  Rajasthan Tax Bar Association have filed a petition before  Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT), Rajasthan and urged him  to not to allow anyone else then advocates Registered with state Bar Councils to appear in any proceeding before Assessing Authorities as well as Appellate Authorities of Income Tax.
In my opinion , all such representations are coming out of following two judgments of Madras High Court and Supreme court. i.e Bar Council of India Vs A.K.Balaji [SLP(Civil)No(s)17150-17154/2012] Dt.4.7.2012 (SC) & A.K.Balaji Vs Govt. of India (2012) 35 KLR 290 21.02.2012 (Madras HC)
The recent remarks of the Apex court in the case of Madras Bar Association Vs. Union of India on chartered accountants at the time of declaring NTT unconstitutional have also added fire in to it. Now Explanation to Section 288(2) of Income Tax Act on the lines of the definition of Chartered Accountant in the Companies Act is about to land. These amendments will take effect from 1st June, 2015. where following classes of persons are excluded from being called Accountant:
i.  Those persons who are not eligible for appointment as an Auditor in the case of a company as per Section 141(3) of the Companies Act, 2013
It will further add the fuel and it shall be a tool in the hands of authorities to harass us. Because of activeness of Social media, now Government is issuing clarifications on day to day basis, what’s a wrong with the ICAI to issue a clarificatory note over the issue? That note shall definitely support us to counter their misrepresentations.
.......

Cross Refer :
comment posted on the website/Facebook

Old Blogs  -specimen >

swamilook: SC WRIT - NTT ACT, 2005 ultra vires the ... 

swamilook: SC on National Tax Tribunal - Imp Messages >>>>



    <> Taxprofessionals


    < Manish Kumar Gupta
    B.Com, A.C.A
    + 91 9718262561
    E-mail: camanishkg@gmail.com