An Update
>>>>>
>>>
lci
Citation
prev
ITATONLINE
Top CA Firms, E&Y, Deloitte, KPMG & PWC, Hauled Up For ...
www.itatonline.org › Home › All Information
Get Set- without waiting for signal to, - ready and go <even now !
Support has also been drawn from the judgement of the Bombay High Court in Lawyers Collective vs. Bar Council where it was held that even “drafting documents, reviewing and providing comments on documents, conducting negotiations and advising clients on international standards and customary practice relating to the client’s transaction etc. was nothing but practising the profession of law in non litigious matters”.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
previous
FLORIDA >
TOI
Inter-Relationship between Accounting and Taxation - ICAI ...
www.icaiknowledgegateway.org/.../chapter-12-inter-relationship-between-a...
>>>>>
www.itatonline.org › Home › All Information
Random Reaction (to share own thoughts, but mostly aimed
at provoking the rest all around to give in-depth thoughts, as warranted):
THE Complaint , in one’s independent but unbiased and impartial
view, is, to react honestly, really not against just the named Big four, but against the whole CA
fraternity; if looked through insightfully, call for much deeper reactions, not
just from CA – but from both the fraternities mutually lined against, with the
aim of common good.
If incisively considered and judged, in the ultimate
analysis, it has every potential, not-so-obvious though, to impact, impair and
imperil greatly the very ‘legal regime’; and, in turn, making ‘public interest’ the casualty- intended or conscious of , OR NOT.
To Admn.
The term “Hauled Up” is contextually the most inappropriate usage
and seemingly makes no sense, except to make the development a sensatinal o; for an appreciation in, in proper light, suggest to look up any standard dictionary (English
to English).
>>>
-
as SILF's Bhasin vows to go after Big 4's best friendswww.legallyindia.com/Law-firms/silf-to-go-after-pds-advaita-and-ors-in-...Litigation Against Accountants and Lawyers - Gibson Dunnwww.gibsondunn.com/.../Dickey-YearOfLivingDangerously.pdfAccounting Firms and the Unauthorized Practice of Lawhttps://mckinneylaw.iu.edu/ilr/pdf/vol33p599.pdf
lci
Citation
[2015] 54 taxmann.com 200
(Bombay)
Judgement
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Rashmikant Kundalia
v.
Union of India
MOHIT S. SHAH, CJ.
AND B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
AND B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 771 OF 2014
FEBRUARY 9, 2015
JUDGMENT
B.P. Colabawalla, J. - Rule. Respondents through their
respective counsel waive service. By consent of parties, rule made returnable
forthwith and heard finally.
2. By this Writ Petition filed
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners have challenged
the constitutional validity of section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Section 234E seeks to levy a fee of Rs.200/- per day (subject to certain other
conditions as set out therein) inter alia on a person who deducts Tax at Source
(TDS) and then fails to deliver or cause to be delivered the TDS
return/statements to the authorities within the prescribed period.
Consequently, the Petitioners have also sought a declaration that the notices
issued to Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 under section 200A of the Act are null, void
and bad-in-law being ultra vires the Constitution of India.
.....
prev
ITATONLINE
Top CA Firms, E&Y, Deloitte, KPMG & PWC, Hauled Up For ...
www.itatonline.org › Home › All Information
Get Set- without waiting for signal to, - ready and go <even now !
- Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:
- Legal Profession Is Under A Cloud & Requires Revival: Bar Council Of India
- Advertisement by Advocates
- Best CA Firms (Transfer Pricing) In India: International Tax Review
- ICAI Takes Stern View Of Strictures Passed By ITAT On CA Profession
- ITAT Bar Resolution On Measures To Tackle Alleged Corruption In ITAT
Supreme Court in Madras
Bar Association v Union of India where it was held that
Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries cannot be permitted to appear on
behalf of a party before the National Tax Tribunal.
e unauthorised practice of law.Support has also been drawn from the judgement of the Bombay High Court in Lawyers Collective vs. Bar Council where it was held that even “drafting documents, reviewing and providing comments on documents, conducting negotiations and advising clients on international standards and customary practice relating to the client’s transaction etc. was nothing but practising the profession of law in non litigious matters”.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
previous
FLORIDA >
Recent ABA Formal Ethics Opinion examines obligations of
lawyers in providing file documents to former clients after termination
<>
Swaminathan Venkataraman Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Disclaimer: this e-mail is not an advertisement, does not contain any legal advice, and does not create an attorney/client relationship and the comments herein should not be relied upon by anyone who reads it.
????
......................
<>
Swaminathan Venkataraman Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Ref. “Of course, lawyers must determine which rule their jurisdiction applies before acting.”
Even on a quick reading, there could be many genuine doubts arising in anyone’s mind. For instance. Re. ‘Jurisdiction’, is it the jurisdiction or ‘locale’, of either or both, lawyer and client, which is of relevance, and should apply? A more difficult question may arise- where either of or both lawyer and client (say, if in a given case, either or both being a corporate) have locale / functions from both jurisdictions spoken of . For that matter, as is imagined, the two varying approaches i.e. ‘entire file’ and ‘end product’ by themselves might entail litigation ; turn out to be an inconclusive one, and unlikely to get resolved within ‘life time’ !
Similar controversies pivoted on ‘jurisdiction’ might arise, or have already arisen but remaining unresolved, in disputes between doctor and patient , and business entity and client / customer e,g. In Banking sector.
Even on a quick reading, there could be many genuine doubts arising in anyone’s mind. For instance. Re. ‘Jurisdiction’, is it the jurisdiction or ‘locale’, of either or both, lawyer and client, which is of relevance, and should apply? A more difficult question may arise- where either of or both lawyer and client (say, if in a given case, either or both being a corporate) have locale / functions from both jurisdictions spoken of . For that matter, as is imagined, the two varying approaches i.e. ‘entire file’ and ‘end product’ by themselves might entail litigation ; turn out to be an inconclusive one, and unlikely to get resolved within ‘life time’ !
Similar controversies pivoted on ‘jurisdiction’ might arise, or have already arisen but remaining unresolved, in disputes between doctor and patient , and business entity and client / customer e,g. In Banking sector.
Disclaimer: this e-mail is not an advertisement, does not contain any legal advice, and does not create an attorney/client relationship and the comments herein should not be relied upon by anyone who reads it.
????
......................
...
Hello everyone and welcome to this Ethics Alert which
will discuss the recent decision of The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors of to
approve language to be added to the comment to Florida Bar Rule 4-5.8 related
to lawyers leaving law firms. An article in The Florida Bar News discusses the
proposed revision and is here: http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/7d1fa5d263aee7a585257dc400492f7d!OpenDocument