Tuesday, June 10, 2014

Lci , ICAI, Sorties, et al

TG

 ICAI initiative on ITAT remark on CA profession and& functions of ICAI

xtract

The Council is conscious of its responsibility to regulate the conduct of its members. Whenever the Institute come across with any lapse(s) with regard to the conduct of any member, the same is appropriately dealt with under the disciplinary mechanism of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Rules framed.

The Council is conscious of its responsibility to regulate the conduct of its members. Whenever the Institute come across with any lapse(s) with regard to the conduct of any member, the same is appropriately dealt with under the disciplinary mechanism of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Rules framed. - See more at: http://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-initiative-itat-remark-ca-profession-functions-icai.html#sthash.3anUJmw7.dpuf
The Council is conscious of its responsibility to regulate the conduct of its members. Whenever the Institute come across with any lapse(s) with regard to the conduct of any member, the same is appropriately dealt with under the disciplinary mechanism of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Rules framed. - See more at: http://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-initiative-itat-remark-ca-profession-functions-icai.html#sthash.3anUJmw7.dpuf
The Council is conscious of its responsibility to regulate the conduct of its members. Whenever the Institute come across with any lapse(s) with regard to the conduct of any member, the same is appropriately dealt with under the disciplinary mechanism of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and the Rules framed. - See more at: http://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/icai-initiative-itat-remark-ca-profession-functions-icai.html#sthash.3anUJmw7.dpuf

itatonline

The following important judgement is available for download at itatonline.org.

Vijay V Meghani vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT laments severe fall in standards of CA profession. Advices ICAI to take disciplinary proceedings against erring members & tackle issue on war footing


TG
June 30
Why Tax Practitioners Bill Required For India?

LCI
Form 'A'
 Deed of declaration & agreement of sale - by Balaji Bingi


RTI
Rti activist contesting case.
Query >
.....This can not be PIL as its related to one particular school.???????

<><><><>... seemingly worth a study on THE 'first principles


Allahabad High Court
Ajai Kumar Singh {P.I.L.} vs State Of U.P.Thru Secreatry ... on 28 June, 2010

http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1461095/

Often they are actuated by a desire to win notoriety or cheap popularity. The petitions of such busy bodies deserve to be thrown out by rejection at the threshold, and in appropriate cases with exemplary costs."
It is further contended that Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgment and Order dated 18.01.2010 in Civil Appeal No. 1134-1135 of 2002, State of Uttaranchal Vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal & ors reported in 2010 AIR SCW 1029 considered the evolution of the Public Interest Litigation in India and expressed its concern regarding the abuse of the process of Courts through PIL. Being concerned with the abuse the Hon'ble Supreme Court issued directions to preserve the purity and sanctity of PIL as under:-
"198. In order to preserve the purity and sanctity of the PIL, it has become imperative to issue the following directions:
(1) The courts must encourage genuine and bona fide PIL and effectively discourage and curb the PIL filed for extraneous considerations.
(2) Instead of every individual judge devising his own procedure for dealing with the public interest litigation, it would be appropriate for each High Court to properly formulate rules for encouraging the genuine PIL and discouraging the PIL filed with oblique motives. Consequently, we request that the High Courts who have not yet framed the rules, should frame the rules within three months. The Registrar General of each High Court is directed to ensure that a copy of the Rules prepared by the High Court is sent to the Secretary General of this Court immediately thereafter.
(3) The courts should prima facie verify the credentials of the petitioner before entertaining a P.I.L.
(4) The court should be prima facie satisfied regarding the correctness of the contents of the petition before entertaining a PIL.
(5) The court should be fully satisfied that substantial public interest is involved before entertaining the petition.
(6) The court should ensure that the petition which involves larger public interest, gravity and urgency must be given priority over other petitions.
(7) The courts before entertaining the PIL should ensure that the PIL is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury. The court should also ensure that there is no personal gain, private motive or oblique motive behind filing the public interest litigation.
(8) The court should also ensure that the petitions filed by busybodies for extraneous and ulterior motives must be discouraged by imposing exemplary costs or by adopting similar novel methods to curb frivolous petitions and the petitions filed for extraneous considerations.



ICAI
(TG)



No comments:

Post a Comment